So sánh chính sách bế quan tỏa cảng của Việt Nam với các quốc gia khác trong lịch sử

4
(272 votes)

The history of nations is often marked by periods of isolation and interaction with the outside world. One such policy, known as "bế quan tỏa cảng" (closing the country's borders), has been adopted by various civilizations throughout history, each with its own unique motivations and consequences. While the term "bế quan tỏa cảng" is specifically associated with Vietnam, its essence resonates with similar policies implemented in other parts of the world. This essay delves into the historical context of Vietnam's "bế quan tỏa cảng" policy, comparing and contrasting it with analogous policies adopted by other nations, highlighting the commonalities and differences in their motivations, implementation, and outcomes.

The Vietnamese "Bế Quan Tỏa Cảng" Policy

The "bế quan tỏa cảng" policy in Vietnam, primarily implemented during the Lê dynasty (1428-1788), was a deliberate attempt to limit foreign trade and interaction. This policy was driven by a complex interplay of factors, including the desire to maintain national security, preserve cultural identity, and control economic resources. The Vietnamese rulers sought to protect their newly established kingdom from external threats, particularly from powerful neighboring empires like China. They also aimed to prevent the influx of foreign ideas and influences that could potentially disrupt their Confucian-based social order. Furthermore, the policy aimed to ensure that the Vietnamese economy remained under their control, preventing foreign merchants from exploiting their resources.

The Chinese "Closed Door" Policy

China, throughout its long history, has also experienced periods of isolationism. The Qing dynasty (1644-1912), particularly during the reign of Emperor Kangxi (1661-1722), implemented a "closed door" policy, restricting foreign trade and interaction to a limited number of ports. This policy was driven by similar concerns as Vietnam's "bế quan tỏa cảng," including the desire to maintain national security, preserve cultural identity, and control economic resources. The Qing rulers feared the influence of foreign powers, particularly the European colonial powers, who were expanding their influence in Asia. They also sought to protect their traditional Confucian values and social order from external influences.

The Japanese "Sakoku" Policy

Japan, during the Edo period (1603-1868), implemented a policy known as "sakoku," which literally translates to "closed country." This policy, similar to Vietnam's "bế quan tỏa cảng" and China's "closed door" policy, aimed to limit foreign interaction and trade. The Japanese rulers, fearing the influence of foreign powers, particularly the Portuguese and Dutch, who had established trading posts in Japan, sought to maintain their national sovereignty and cultural identity. They also aimed to prevent the spread of Christianity, which they perceived as a threat to their traditional beliefs and social order.

Comparing and Contrasting the Policies

While the "bế quan tỏa cảng," "closed door," and "sakoku" policies shared common motivations, there were also significant differences in their implementation and outcomes. Vietnam's "bế quan tỏa cảng" policy was more focused on maintaining national security and preserving cultural identity, while China's "closed door" policy was more concerned with controlling economic resources and preventing foreign influence. Japan's "sakoku" policy, on the other hand, was primarily driven by the fear of foreign powers and the desire to maintain national sovereignty.

In terms of implementation, Vietnam's "bế quan tỏa cảng" policy was more restrictive than China's "closed door" policy, which allowed limited trade with certain foreign powers. Japan's "sakoku" policy was the most stringent, effectively isolating the country from the outside world for over two centuries.

The outcomes of these policies also varied. Vietnam's "bế quan tỏa cảng" policy, while successful in maintaining national security and preserving cultural identity, ultimately led to economic stagnation and technological backwardness. China's "closed door" policy, while initially successful in protecting the country from foreign influence, eventually led to a decline in economic competitiveness and technological innovation. Japan's "sakoku" policy, while successful in preserving national sovereignty and cultural identity, ultimately led to a period of isolation and technological stagnation.

Conclusion

The "bế quan tỏa cảng" policy in Vietnam, along with similar policies implemented in China and Japan, reflects a common desire among nations to protect their sovereignty, cultural identity, and economic interests. While these policies shared common motivations, their implementation and outcomes varied significantly, highlighting the complex interplay of historical, cultural, and political factors that shape a nation's relationship with the outside world. Ultimately, these policies serve as a reminder of the delicate balance between isolation and interaction, and the potential consequences of choosing one over the other.